This article will introduce some of the connections, exchanges, differences and controversies between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology, and what implications and impacts they have on our lives and minds. Hope you enjoy and benefit from it.
##Overview Tibetan Buddhism is an ancient and profound religious and philosophical system that involves Human beings have rich psychological skills and wisdom regarding concepts such as life and death, reincarnation, emptiness, and enlightenment. Psychology is a modern and scientific discipline that focuses on human psychological processes, behavior, emotions, personality, etc., and has a variety of theories and methods. There are some commonalities and differences between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology, as well as some complementarity and interaction. Some psychologists and Buddhists have had conversations and exchanges, exploring the similarities and differences between the two, and how they can learn from and promote each other.
##Jungian Psychology and Tibetan Buddhism Jungian psychology is a school of psychology founded by Swiss psychologist Carl Jung. It mainly focuses on the unconscious level of human beings and believes that there are some universal archetypes and symbols in the unconscious. , they can be expressed through dreams, myths, art, etc. Jungian psychology also emphasizes the individual development of human beings, that is, self-realization, which is a process of integrating consciousness and unconsciousness that requires people to face their own shadows and inner opposites such as anima/animus.
Jung had a deep interest in and research on Tibetan Buddhism. He once wrote the Tibetan Book of the Dead “Written the preface to the English translation of the book, and said that this book had a great influence on his thinking. He believes that the “Tibetan Book of the Dead” is a psychological guide that describes the unconscious level of human beings. It reveals the various states and stages that humans experience in the process of death, and how to use these states and stages to achieve self-liberation. He also believes that some of the symbolic images described in the Tibetan Sutra of the Dead, such as white light, lotus, Buddha, etc., are strikingly similar to the unconscious archetypes he discovered. Jung also expressed his appreciation for the psychological techniques and wisdom found in Tibetan Buddhism. He believes that Tibetan Buddhism has many methods of dreaming, meditation, observation, analysis, etc., which can help people explore their unconscious levels and discover their true nature. He also believes that Tibetan Buddhism has many teachings on life and death, reincarnation, emptiness, and enlightenment, which can help people transcend their own fears and attachments and achieve self-liberation and perfection. ##Cognitive Therapy and Tibetan Buddhism Cognitive therapy is a psychotherapy method founded by American psychologist Aaron Baker. It mainly focuses on human cognitive processes and believes that people’s emotions and behaviors are affected by their thoughts and beliefs. influences, and these thoughts and beliefs are often irrational or wrong. The purpose of cognitive therapy is to help people discover and change their irrational or erroneous thoughts and beliefs, thereby improving their mood and behavior.
Baker also has a certain understanding and interest in Tibetan Buddhism. He once conducted discussions with Dalai Lama dialogue and compared Buddhist and cognitive therapy approaches. He believes that Buddhism and cognitive therapy have some things in common. For example, they both emphasize that people’s thoughts and beliefs have an important impact on their emotions and behaviors, and both advocate that people change their thoughts and beliefs by observing and analyzing their own psychological processes. , all advocate that people verify their thoughts and beliefs through practice and experience. He also believes that there are some differences between Buddhism and cognitive therapy. For example, Buddhism pays more attention to people’s spiritual level, while cognitive therapy pays more attention to people’s daily lives; Buddhism emphasizes people’s emptiness and selflessness, while cognitive therapy emphasizes more. People’s self-esteem and self; Buddhism prefers to use subjective methods such as meditation, while cognitive therapy prefers to use objective methods such as logic. ##Mindfulness Therapy and Tibetan Buddhism Mindfulness therapy is a psychotherapy method founded by American medical scientist Jon Kabat-Zinn. It mainly focuses on human attention and consciousness, believing that people are often troubled by the past or the future and ignore it. of present existence. The purpose of mindfulness therapy is to help people develop an attitude of being focused on the present moment, accepting rather than judgmental, and aware rather than automatic, thereby improving their mental health and quality of life.
Kabat-Zinn was inspired by Tibetan Buddhism and introduced mindfulness into psychotherapy. He believes that mindfulness is a psychological skill derived from the Buddhist tradition, which can help people get rid of their own distress and troubles and achieve self-awareness and liberation. He also believes that mindfulness is not only a psychological skill, but also a way of life that can help people enhance their connection and coordination with nature, society, the universe, etc. He also believes that mindfulness is not only an individual-level practice, but also a group-level practice. It can help people build and maintain a community of love, wisdom, compassion, responsibility, equality, respect, and cooperation. , have a harmonious society and world. ##Differences and controversies There are also some differences and controversies between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology. These issues are also worthy of our attention and thinking. The differences and controversies between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology mainly involve the following aspects: - Worldview and Methodology: Tibetan Buddhism is a religious and philosophical system based on concepts such as the law of cause and effect, reincarnation, emptiness, and enlightenment. of belief and understanding, using subjective methods such as meditation, prayer, and rituals to achieve self-liberation and perfection. Psychology is a science and discipline that is based on the observation and testing of psychological processes, behaviors, emotions, personality and other phenomena, and uses objective methods such as logic, experimentation, statistics, etc. to analyze and explain the human mind. The two have different or even opposite views on human nature, purpose, value and other issues, and they also have different or even mutually exclusive standards in research methods. - Cultural and historical background: Tibetan Buddhism is an oriental culture originating from India and Tibet. It is influenced by Tibetan geography, history, ethnicity, religion and other factors, forming a unique and diverse culture. feature. Psychology is a Western culture originating from Europe and America. It has been influenced by Western philosophy, science, society and other factors, forming a universal and unified cultural paradigm. There are huge differences between the two in terms of language, characters, symbols, traditions, customs, etc., and there are also complex exchanges and conflicts in history. - doctrinal and practical content: Tibetan Buddhism is a Buddhist school with Tantra as its main feature. It contains many teachings and practices about deities, mandalas, mantras, initiations, etc. These teachings and practices are often It has a profound and mysterious meaning that needs to be obtained and practiced through the guidance and inheritance of a guru. Psychology is a kind of theory and method that includes many aspects of cognition, emotion, motivation, personality, etc. These theories and methods often have clear and scientific basis and need to be verified and applied through study and experiment. The two have different and even contradictory opinions on the content of doctrine and practice, and they also have different and even controversial evaluations on the effects of doctrine and practice. These differences and controversies do not mean that Tibetan Buddhism and psychology are irreconcilable or incompatible; rather, they reflect the diversity and complexity between the two, as well as their different perspectives on issues of the human mind and contribute. We need to maintain open and critical thinking, engage in useful dialogue and exchanges, learn and draw from them, and also discover and innovate from them. Only in this way can we better understand ourselves and others, live and grow better. ##Conclusion The above is the content of the dialogue between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology that this article has shared with you. I hope you will like it and benefit from it. Through this article, we can learn about the multifaceted connections and exchanges between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology, and what enlightenment and impact they have on our lives and minds. We can see that Tibetan Buddhism and psychology are both ways of exploring the human mind. They can both help us understand ourselves, change ourselves, and realize ourselves. We can also see that there are some differences and controversies between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology. They both have their own advantages and limitations, and we need to maintain open and critical thinking and engage in useful dialogue and exchanges. Finally, we can also see that there are some complementarities and interactions between Tibetan Buddhism and psychology. They can both provide us with some useful methods and skills to make our lives better and happier. > #####References: > - Jung, CG (1961). Preface to The Tibetan Book of the Dead. In WY Evans-Wentz (Ed.), The Tibetan Book of the Dead (pp. 9 -20). Oxford University Press. > - Beck, AT, & Rinpoche, G. (2018). The mind and life dialogues: Conversations on the frontiers of science and Buddhism. In FJ Varela & A. Zajonc (Eds.), The new physics and cosmology: Dialogues with the Dalai Lama (pp. 121-140). Oxford University Press. > - Wallace, BA (2000). The taboo of subjectivity: Toward a new science of consciousness. Oxford University Press. > - Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical psychology: Science and practice, 10(2), 144-156. > - Koltko-Rivera, ME, & Lopez , SJ (2018). Tibetan culture and psychology: An introduction for psychologists and other mental health professionals. In SJ Lopez & ME Koltko-Rivera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and culture (pp. 67-86). Oxford University Press. > - Kabat-Zinn, J., Davidson, RJ, & Harrington, A. (2002). The mind’s own physician: A scientific dialogue with the Dalai Lama on the healing power of meditation. New Harbinger Publications.
Link to this article: https://psyctest.cn/article/2DxzYN5A/
If the original article is reprinted, please indicate the author and the source in the form of this link.
